Journal of Earth, Science, Economy and Justice (JESEJ) incorporates insights from the fields of sciences which have implications for Earth and her economy. This journal is an initiative of East India Research Council (EIRC), Centre for Economic History and Accountability (CEHA) and Jurists Association (JA).
Written By Unknown on Monday, September 30, 2013 | 6:08 AM
Published: 29th Sep 2013 09:31:33 AM, The New Indian Express
After the Supreme Court ruling that the Aadhaar card issued by Unique
Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) is not mandatory to receive
essential government services, the fate of UPA government’s other ‘data
mining’ projects through National Information Utilities (NIUs) hangs in
balance.
It is no surprise that the recommendation to set up NIUs
for five projects—Goods and Services Tax, Tax Information Network,
Expenditure Information Network, National Treasury Management Agency and
New Pension System to collect and store taxpayer’s data with private
companies for centralised tax collection and registration came from a
committee, Technology Advisory Group for Unique Projects (TAG-UP),
headed by UIDAI chairman Nandan Nilekani. These NIUs will be constituted
as private companies with taxpayer’s money. Surprisingly, they will not
only collect and store your personal information but also levy user
charges if you want to avail its services in future.
The committee in 2011 had recommended that private ownership within NIUs
should be at least 51 per cent and government—Centre and state’s—role
would become that of a paying customer with each having 24.5 per cent
ownership in the company.According to a secret cabinet note,
government has already approved Rs 315 crore to set up just one company
to collect Goods and Services Tax data. The move was opposed by the
Department of Expenditure saying it would be wrong if controlling stake
of 51 per cent is held by private companies without any substantial
investment.
The government was told by the Nilekani-headed TAG-UP
committee that decentralisation of government function by introducing
such information technology projects will bring efficiency in governance
and it will increase tax collection. The objection of DoE was overruled
by the UPA government justifying the arrangement for a larger goal of
bringing independence, flexibility and professional environment through
private companies.
According to the plan, entire individual
data—direct and indirect taxes—including registration, return and
payment by taxpayers will be in custody of private company that will
operate from Delhi and Mumbai. Independent law researcher Usha Ramnathan
said turning public data into a private entity is a serious issue
connected with the privacy of individual. “It is a complete highway
robbery. In fact, UIDAI was model to establish NIUs where all government
data should be handed over to private companies. If you hand over the
complete data of public without creating a capacity within the
government, the entire system would collapse if tomorrow court rules
against it,” said Ramanathan.
With the creation of NIUs, these
projects will ensure that entire population, even non-taxpayers or those
exempted from paying taxes by the government are carefully tagged like
UIDAI. The secret cabinet note reveals that in some states where tribal
population is exempted from tax, an idea of issuing dummy PAN card was
suggested to mark the entire state population.
“The representative
of Sikkim indicated that in Sikkim no income tax is payable for
Scheduled Tribe and therefore they do not have PAN numbers. It was
clarified by Dr Nandan Nilekani that for Sikkim and some other
north-eastern states dummy PAN numbers can be issued,” note said.
Gopal
Krishna of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties said all the projects
related to UIDAI which were launched to collect and store personal data
raises serious security concerns as they are untested, unreliable and
based on unsafe technology.
“All the committee reports headed by
Nandan Nilekani will be adversely affected by SC order. The UIDAI
intention of making it mandatory was exposed as they cannot by force
collect biometric of an individual. This tagging of people and handing
over public data to private company is a dangerous trend which was even
abandoned by the developed nations including US and UK,” Krishna said.
However,
a government official on the condition of anonymity said issues of
privacy and security concerns about private companies are unfounded as
government will have strategic control of the NIUs through special
resolution and composition of board.
“It will have a robust IT infrastructure and security system to protect the information,” the official said.
Post a Comment